Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-2750,single-format-standard,bridge-core-1.0.5,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-18.1,qode-theme-bridge,qode_header_in_grid,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.0.2,vc_responsive

Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform

Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform

Driving the country roads of Scotland, Ireland and Wales, I have sometimes been lucky enough to be blocked by sheep being moved from one pasture to another.

I say ‘lucky’ because it allows me to watch an impressive performance by a dog – usually a Border Collie.

What a show! A single, mid-sized dog herding two or three hundred sheep, keeping them moving in the right direction, rounding up strays, knowing how to intimidate but not cause panic, funneling them all through a gate, and obviously enjoying the challenge.

Why a Border Collie? Why not an Akita or Xoloitzcuintli or another of about 400 breeds listed on the Internet?

Because, among the people for whom herding sheep is serious business, there is general agreement that Border Collies are better at doing what needs to be done than any other dog. They have ‘the knack.’

That knack is so important that those who care most about Border Collies even oppose their being entered in dog shows. That, they say, would lead to the Border Collie being bred to look good, and looking good isn’t the point. Brains, innate ability, performance – that’s the point.

Other breeds are no less impressive in other ways. If you’re lost in a snowstorm in the Alps, you don’t need a Border Collie. You need a big, strong dog with a really good nose, lots of fur, wide feet that don’t sink too deeply into snow, and an unerring sense of direction for returning with help. You need a Saint Bernard.

If varmints are sneaking into your hen house, killing your chickens, and escaping down holes in a nearby field, you don’t need a Border Collie or a Saint Bernard, you need a Fox Terrier.

It isn’t that many different breeds can’t be taught to herd, lead high-altitude rescue efforts, or kill foxes. They can. It’s just that teaching all dogs to do things which one particular breed can do better than any other doesn’t make much sense.

We accept the reasonableness of that argument for dogs. We reject it for kids.

The non-educators now running the education show say American kids are lagging ever-farther behind in science and math, and that the consequences of that for America’s economic well-being could be catastrophic.

So, what is this rich, advantaged country of ours doing to try to beat out the competition?

Mainly, we put in place the No Child Left Behind program, now replaced by Race to the Top and the Common Core State Standards Initiative. If that fact makes you optimistic about the future of education in America, think again about dogs.

There are all kinds of things they can do besides herd, rescue, and engage foxes. They can sniff luggage for bombs. Chase felons. Stand guard duty. Retrieve downed game birds. Guide the blind. Detect certain diseases. Locate earthquake survivors. Entertain audiences. Play nice with little kids. Go for help if Little Nell falls down a well.

So, with No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top as models, let’s set performance standards for these and all other canine capabilities and train all dogs to meet them. All 400 breeds. All skills. Leave No Dog Behind!

Two-hundred-pound Mastiffs may have a little trouble with the chase-the-fox-down-the-hole standard, and Chihuahuas will probably have difficulty with the tackle-the-felon-and-pin-him-to-the-ground standard. But, hey, no excuses! Standards are standards! Leave No Dog Behind.

Think there’s something wrong with a same-standards-and-tests-for-everybody approach to educating? Think a math whiz shouldn’t be held back just because he can’t write a good five-paragraph essay? Think a gifted writer shouldn’t be refused a diploma because she can’t solve a quadratic equation? Think a promising trumpet player shouldn’t be kept out of the school orchestra or pushed out on the street because he can’t remember the date of the Boxer Rebellion?

If you think there’s something fundamentally, dangerously wrong with an educational reform effort that’s actually designed to standardize, designed to ignore human variation, designed to penalize individual differences, designed to produce a generation of clones, photocopy this column.

If you think it’s stupid to require every kid to read the same books, think the same thoughts, parrot the same answers, make several photocopies. And in the margin at the top of each, write, in longhand, something like, “Please explain why the standards and accountability fad isn’t a criminal waste of brains,” or, “Why are you trashing America’s hope for the future?” or just, “Does this make sense?”

Send the copies to your senators and representatives before they sell their vote to the publishing and testing corporations intent on getting an ever-bigger slice of that half-trillion dollars a year America spends on educating.

(This article was originally published on the Washington Post’s Answer Sheet blog.)

Image: UCLA Newsroom
  • Pingback:Tweets that mention Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform | Ecology of Education --
    Posted at 14:41h, 16 August Reply

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jason Flom , Liz Becker. Liz Becker said: Interesting perspective RT @JasonFlom: "Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform" by Marion Brady | Ecology of Ed […]

  • Liz Becker
    Posted at 18:40h, 16 August Reply

    Interesting perspective RT @JasonFlom: "Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform" by Marion Brady | Ecology of Ed

  • Berni Wall
    Posted at 20:26h, 16 August Reply

    RT @alexgfrancisco: Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform | Ecology of Education #edchat

  • Sam Chaltain
    Posted at 20:32h, 16 August Reply

    RT @rliberni: RT @alexgfrancisco: Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform | Ecology of Education #edchat

  • Pedro Villarrubia
    Posted at 20:33h, 16 August Reply

    RT @alexgfrancisco: Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform | Ecology of Education #edchat

  • gcouros
    Posted at 20:40h, 16 August Reply

    Really enjoyed the connections here: Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform | Ecology of Education

  • Eagle Rock School
    Posted at 21:36h, 16 August Reply

    RT @samchaltain: RT @rliberni: RT @alexgfrancisco: Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform | Ecology of Education #edchat

  • Pingback:Twitted by bluskyz
    Posted at 22:21h, 16 August Reply

    […] This post was Twitted by bluskyz […]

  • Will Richardson
    Posted at 00:38h, 17 August Reply

    Love it: "Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform" So true.

  • BJ Berquist
    Posted at 01:26h, 17 August Reply

    RT @willrich45: Love it: "Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform" So true.

  • Robert Paterson
    Posted at 01:35h, 17 August Reply

    RT @willrich45: Love it: "Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform" So true. Yea!

  • christian füller
    Posted at 05:12h, 17 August Reply

    this text is dangerously stupid: it demands to skip basic skills for every student (via. @willrich45) dogs& #edReform

  • Tony Parkin
    Posted at 06:35h, 17 August Reply

    RT @willrich45: "Love it: "Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform" So true." (and good for UK too!)

  • Maggie LaBarbera RN
    Posted at 14:55h, 17 August Reply

    RT @tappedinorg RT @willrich45 Love it: "Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform" So true. #edu #teaching #policy

  • Baiba Svenca
    Posted at 09:41h, 18 August Reply

    Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform via @AddToAny

  • EdOptions
    Posted at 18:20h, 18 August Reply

    Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform – (via @Eco_of_Ed) Is it 'Leave No Dog Behind?'

  • Ashley Burleson
    Posted at 18:20h, 18 August Reply

    Dogs: An Unusual Guide to School Reform – (via @Eco_of_Ed) Is it 'Leave No Dog Behind?'

  • Joep De Graaff
    Posted at 20:46h, 19 August Reply

    This is a lousy metaphor. It is based on poor ethology. It results in detrimental ethics.

    Dogs are bred to demonstrate predictable behaviour to meet to their master’s wishes. Being descendants from wolves, domesticated by mankind, they love to follow the leader of their pack, which happens to be a human being. That’s why dogs are eager to show their innate qualities and don’ t need to overcome their flaws. Most dogs are not aware of their flaws. Don’t teach your dog to overcome his dependency, it will result in a mean companion. You can train your dog to do tricks based on his natural behaviour, retrieve a stick and so on. That’s all.

    Humans are educated to enable creative versatile behaviour with which they can react to unpredictable circumstances independently and thereby pursue their personal happiness and shore up the common good of their tribe. They may heed the chief’s stance, but only if it makes sense. That’s why they need a broad knowledge and understanding even in those fields in which they are not that talented. They need to learn a lot of things. Being able to learn a lot of things is the quintessential talent of our species. Homo sapiens is a far better learner than Canis lupus familiaris.

    Secondary education must guarantee that everyone can participate in society and contribute to the survival of the species. That’s why everyone has to attain a basic curriculum. On top of that everyone has to develop his natural talents for making a living as an expert, as a plumber, a rocket scientist or as a trumpet player. We need all those special skills and talents.

    But we definitely need the excellent trumpet player to have also an educated opinion on matters of science: he has to vote on legislation which deals with environmental issues, for example. We don’t want daft voters, do we? We don’t want to treat musical talents like dogs who are rewarded with a cookie or hug when showing their tricks on request of the master, do we? We don’t want the plumber to be invoked as a politician’s running gag “Joe the Plumber,” do we?

    Standardised testing guarantees that students push themselves to pass muster in a broad range of subjects, not only in their favourite activity. Without standards they would be too lazy and bail out. The trumpet player might get his applause but the world will collapse.

    Heed the chief’s caution: we need standardised tests. It makes sense!

  • Anonymous
    Posted at 21:15h, 19 August Reply

    “Without standards they would be too lazy and bail out.”

    Are you saying that people are inherently lazy and that academic standards are enough to negate that natural tendency? How did folks muster any initiative in the days before standards?

  • Chad - Online Degrees
    Posted at 22:31h, 25 August Reply

    When did folks never have standards. As far back as man I’m sure even the early man had standards (but not what we think of standards today).

  • Anabel Warring
    Posted at 18:47h, 28 September Reply

    Awesome, thank you for the site, have you come across, experienced, this article on the bail system? What a redicultous scam here it is if you want to see it

  • plumber surbiton
    Posted at 10:07h, 30 May Reply

    What is the easiest blog site to use? I also need one that you can post pics to from your cell phone?

Post A Comment